Data61 partners with German vendor to protect global defence systems

Wednesday, August 08, 2018 6:51:33 PM






The Cost of Manual Transmission vs Once upon a time, manual transmission vehicles were much more fuel efficient than their automatic transmission brethren. Buying a manual over an automatic often lead to significant cost savings, and there were enough of them being sold and driven that selling and re-sale value were not a problem. Fast forward to today, and manual transmission vehicles are going virtually extinct. I’ll take a look at the fuel efficiency, MSRP savings, and replacement costs of manual transmission vehicles compared to automatic to determine whether or not buying a manual is still worth it or whether its best to let the stick go the way of the dodo. Fueleconomy.gov documents the EPA fuel efficiency comparisons from every make and model going back to 1984. So, I decided to turn back the clock to see what kind of fuel efficiency a manual transmission vehicle back then had over an automatic. I decided to select the 1984 Ford Escort (my dad had a model pretty close to this one at one point). I’ll use today’s gas prices to make the comparison As global warming continues, Trump wants to burn fossil fuels with an arsonists glee - Los Angeles T you figure in inflation, savings comparisons should be fairly equal): 1984 Ford Escort, 1.6L, Manual, 4-Speed: 28 mpg city, 39 mpg highway Annual fuel cost @ $2.04 per gallon and 15,000 miles driven = $950. 1984 Ford Escort, 1.6L, Auto, 3-Speed: 21 mpg city, 26 mpg highway Annual fuel cost @ $2.04 per gallon and 15,000 miles driven = $1,350. Wow, that’s pretty significant. Back in 1984, buying a manual transmission Escort resulted in an annual fuel savings of $400 over an automatic (at today’s gas prices). If you figure you’ll be driving that vehicle for 8 years, essay writing Opinion | Victimizing the Victims, Again looking at a total savings of $3,200. OK, so I can see why manual transmissions were seen as a cost saver. But do they still deserve that reputation? Let’s fast forward to today. The Ford Escort no longer exists, but I found what would be its closest comparison, the 1.6L Ford Fiesta. Let’s take a look at the two vehicles: 2018 Ford Fiesta, 1.6L, Manual, 5-Speed: 27 mpg city, 35 mpg highway Annual fuel cost @ $2.52 per gallon and 15,000 miles driven = $1,250. 2018 Ford Fiesta, 1.6L, Auto, 6-Speed: 27 mpg city, 37 mpg highway Annual fuel cost @ $2.52 per gallon and 15,000 miles driven = $1,200. Wait, how could that be?! The 2018 automatic transmission Fiesta actually gets BETTER fuel efficiency than the manual transmission version! Don’t be surprised. This is the state of automotive transmissions today. Automatic models are usually as efficient as manuals these days, across the board. In my most fuel efficient cars post, I only put the automatic model mpg’s, because I found that at most the manual versions only had 1 mpg better. And in some cases, like the Fiesta, fuel efficiency was worse. And that’s considering the driver actually knows how to freaking drive a manual (hasn’t been the case with 75% of the drivers I’ve had the “privilege” of being a passenger with). Fuel efficiency is no longer a reason to buy a manual transmission vehicle in the modern era. In my cheapest new cars post, I only highlighted the prices of the automatic vehicles, despite the manual versions actually being cheaper. I’ll explain why I did that (other than comparing apples to apples). First, just because you’re buying a manual vehicle at a lower price than an automatic does not mean that you’re necessarily coming out ahead. When you go to sell that vehicle, you’re not going to be able to sell it for the same amount as an automatic. Let’s stick with the Fiesta to do an MSRP comparison. An S hatchback manual 2018 version has an MSRP of $14,040 The automatic version goes for $15,135. This is pretty standard across the board – about a +/-$1,000 difference between the two. There are a lot of factors that go into how much you could re-sell these vehicles for down the road, but 9 times out of 10 you’re going to be able to demand a higher price with the automatic. It may not be the full original difference between the two models, but it will probably be close. Another factor you should consider is how few people out there are actually looking to buy a manual transmission these days. Less than 3% of vehicles sold are manual transmission. Why is that important? Well, when you go to sell your vehicle, you might have trouble if 97% of re-sale market buyers want nothing to do with it. Your vehicle won’t be able to command as much money or as much attention as an automatic and will take much longer to sell (if at all). Sure, certain very expensive sporty cars might be an exception to this rule, but for most makes and models, this rule will hold true. I alluded to many manual transmission drivers not really knowing how to effectively drive a stick. Each time they accelerate and shift late or early, or decelerate and do the same, they are slowly killing their transmission. If they aren’t able to sell their vehicle before the transmission goes, look out! The cost of replacing a transmission varies widely, but expect to pay between $1,000 to $6,000. Automatic transmission go bad much less frequently than manuals… mostly because the machine is much more efficient at changing gears than a human. SkyNet. Suddenly, that $1,000 cost savings does not seem so appealing, does it? Let’s not forget the convenience factor of automatic transmission vehicles. Manual die-hards will tell you that driving a stick has become second nature. They don’t even think about it. That may be, but I prefer to have Data61 partners with German vendor to protect global defence systems extra hand, even if it’s to do things I shouldn’t be doing that take my focus off the road. They’ll also argue it’s “more fun”. I would agree that you’re more engaged or more “in-tune” with a stick. But more fun? I’ll pass on that kind of fun. And they’ll say it’s “faster” because they can time the shifting better than an automatic. That’s doubtful, but even if it was true, drag-racing is out of style these days. Save your money and the hassle. It’s time to put the nail in the coffin of the stick. Have you ever owned a stick? Why? In retrospect did you actually save money over an automatic? Are you a stick die-hard? Convince us automatic trans drivers why we should consider a stick. Related Posts: After graduating from college, I drove a five-speed VW Jetta that I absolutely loved. When I drove it, I was in total control. (Cue Tool Time’s Tim Taylor grunting here.) It didn’t matter if I was driving on the highway or in the city – Woman says I want to be rich and Im not sorry in NYT article loved everything about my little stickshift car, even the subtle rollback if I was stopped on a hill before I put it in 1st gear. Cut to present day, and I’m driving an automatic transmission minivan with two kids in the back seat. My minivan doesn’t have the pickup my Jetta did, and I sometimes feel myself accelerating to shift into a higher gear because the van doesn’t shift as quickly as I would have with my jetta. It also cost less to fill up the jetta, but anyone who trades in a little car for a minivan would be a fool to think that they’d be paying the same for gas. I wouldn’t trade back my minivan for my jetta, mostly because now I need my extra hand to find toys that have fallen on the ground or pacify a crying babe, but I can’t deny that I miss that control. For me, it was never about the cost, and always about the control. I feel ya, and what the op said about people saying manuals are faster they are because the driver can manipulate the gears which can lead to wear and tear down the road. The transmission is not what wears out. If you do not know how to drive it the clutch would need to be replaced. How many people have replaced a manual transmission? A clutch is more common. What does it cost to replace an automatic? To most people who love stick shifts, it never really comes down to cost. I have owned both and have always enjoyed driving a stick more so than an auto. As Katy pointed out an auto is a necessary evil sometimes. There are two vehicles in my opinion that you should not be allowed to buy as an automatic: sports cars and Jeeps (not all Jeeps, not the Grand Cherokees, but the Y and J bodies). However if you are buying either of those cars cost was never a factor for you anyway. I would certainly welcome a stick shift back into my life as long as it’s not my minivan, that would just seem wrong. Not sure about Jeeps, but yeah, if you have a true sports car (Porsche, Ferrari, Lambo, maybe even Miata), then it should be a stick. Ferrari’s aren’t sold with stick shifts anymore. Maybe that’s surprising at first, but one can look at it in different ways: if you view a Ferrari as a street legal race car, then an automatic transmission will accelerate faster, so you get more speed, faster. More realistically though, Ferraris today are more status symbol than a “driver’s car”, and most of the people buying them have enough on their hands with a real wheel drive, no need to throw in a stick to make their lives fully miserable. You must not travel if you think manuals are all but extinct. The US is the only country like that. You got that right. I am from Brazil, and thought they are trying to bring the automatic to the market, you still cannot get a driver license if you don’t drive a stick. The license examiner will not even look at you if you show up on an automatic vehicle. Agree with Trevor, loving to drive stick doesn’t come down to cost, nor should people with sports cars or Jeeps have an automatic! Agree with Brandy, the US really is the only country where manuals are such a minority. They may be still in the minority, but some rental agencies, in Europe, only carried manual. I inherited a Toyota Tercel, which I drove for several years. I ranged b/t 40 – 45 mpg, depending on where I was going. My biggest disappointment when I had to replace that car, was that no other car, manual or automatic (hybrids aside), could come close in fuel efficiency. The sticker rating on manuals isn’t the most efficient way to drive it, so if you do know how to drive one, I bet you can get better fuel economy than what’s rated. For example, I have a co-worker with a Prius that gets 58 mpg, when he wants to. I now have an automatic Corolla, with a lightly bigger engine, but with a fuel economy 28 mpg of it’s definitely costing me more than the Tercel did. When test driving cars, I can definitely say, automatic transmissions felt slower. It might not actually be the case, but that’s how it feels. When you’re driving stick, you’re waiting for the RPMs to go up, so you can shift. In an automatic, you’re just waiting. for it to shift by itself. So you don’t feel like you really accomplished anything by the time it shifts. Anyways, I can’t convince anyone. It’s a personal preference. 🙂 I have this strange foot issue where my MPG tends to hover below the sticker MPG rating… 😀 and that’s why I drive a sports car. I drive a stick currently. Bought it on purpose 4 years ago because I’d always wanted to learn – but I didn’t know how to drive one the morning I bought it. Sure did by the end of the day, and it’s been a pleasure since. I’ve put almost 100,000 miles on it and still don’t regret buying it – a little 4-door Kia Rio that continues to give me 32mpg and I only paid $8,000 for it! I’m sure they were not happy with you when you test drove… Your comparison is not valid, you are comparing a 5-speed vs a 6 speed. The extra gear makes a huge difference in keeping RMPs down while accelerating and typically allowing for a lower RPM while cruising. Also why the 4 speed Escort is better than the 3 speed auto. Why is the comparison any less valid? I realize the speed results in varying mpg, but I honestly couldn’t tell you the difference between a 4-speed and a 6. There wasn’t a 5-speed auto version to compare to. It’s the same vehicle otherwise. More gears = lower RPMs. You basically drive each gear up to a certain RPM, switch, and then drive the next gear up to the same RPM, etc. With 6 gears, you spend less time in each gear to hit your cruising gear, which has a much higher ratio, and therefore requires less fuel to retain the same speed. 5 speeds have one less gear to spread the ratios to the cruising gear out with, and therefore require both more fuel to accelerate to cruising speed, and more fuel to retain the higher RPMs at cruising speed. It does make a difference. actually the O.D. gear is the DETERMING fact about highway mileage. The higher the OD gear, the more fuel efficient highway driving becomes. Comparing a 6 spd auto to a 5 spd manual is no-brainer. lol you not being able to tell the diff between a 4 and a 6 speed makes it less valid. If you don’t know what the difference between a 4-speed gearbox and a 5-speed gearbox are, why are you writing a comparison article about transmissions? You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. One major advantage of having a manual transmission over an automatic is the ability to ‘hypermile’, meaning using the car in a way that gets well above the posted fuel economy for that model. In a manual transmission, one is able to do what is called ‘pulse and glide’, which is the (slightly illegal, in some states) act of revving the car up to a cruising speed of, say, 65mph and then placing the car in neutral and killing the engine. you would then coast to a more nominal speed of around 55mph, pop the clutch in high gear, and then re-accelerate up to 65. in this way, the engine stays off for half of the time you are driving, netting you an infinite mpg for that stretch of road. Persons who are very good at this technique are able to achieve 70mpg regularly on standard cars, 100mpg in some cases. This is, apparently, not nearly as possible in an automatic transmission, as you would have to turn the ignition to restart the car, making the exercise less efficient. Discounting the potential wear on the vehicle, the manual comes out on top in this case. This is the reason that hypermilers insist on manual transmissions, along with the intrinsic control of each aspect of their vehicle. That works if you drive down hill all of the time, but I just don’t understand how this can be an effective strategy on long stretches of flat or uphill road? Whenever I lay off the pedal, friction kicks in pretty quick, and the mph drops instantly. They tend to do it while 5 or 6 feet away from a semi truck, which makes me a little leery when shutting off the engine loses the assisted power to your brakes/steering… When you put your auto in neutral, you will notice considerably less drivetrain friction. Every auto I’ve driven has idled higher in neutral than in-gear. If you keep the vehicle in gear the vehicles slow down will be faster than that of being in neutral, its called engine stopping or engine slow down. your motor will gradually slow itself down to conserve fuel that is why you slow down faster in gear than in neutral. Right now, I have a 2010 VW Golf 2.5, 5 speed and your far better off and safer hypermile’n with your car in gear with a standard. If you coast in neutral, you eventually lose power braking ( very dangerous ) and your power steering, although its not as bad. I think what happens is somehow, your still able to produce vacuum this way, I do it all the time, but I can’t explain why the steering still works, on the Golf MK6 and older Jetta A5’s, they have electric assist, probably still needs vacuum… The Golf’s computer data; still works recording your miles, average mpg’s and all other data, which of course now improve. On older models, this is not the case however. I had a 2006 Audi A4, no such luck, the computer stops even odometer reading on a hypermile. Anyway; you have radio, power windows, bluetooth and front lights this way. You do not have signals… Be careful if a cops in back ! To restart; just turn the ignition on, about 20 feet before the stop sign, your car is fuel injected, so your safe. In the old days with carburators, you had to coast ! Just be careful, never to pull it the ignition key, or your in serious trouble ! Try it this way you’ll love and be careful and pay total attention for your safety, you will improve at least 3-5 mpg in my experience here, but I am in a rural area with several huge long down grades ! You can even do a full shift with gravity power alone, don’t jerk your clutch, use the gravity like you would engine power, experiment with your gears down hill. I go down 3-4 huge grades like 3-4 miles, in northern connecticut, where i live and I Use The Common Application To Simplify The College Process 4th sometimes. Some cars now have done away with those; worthless and dangerous steering wheel lock mechanisms, that began to appear in 1970 or so. You really don’t need these anymore with electronics. So your very safe doin it, essay on Simona Halep vs. Dominika Cibulkova | 2018 Wuhan Open Second Round | WTA Highlights ??????? those BMW’s and some other models, with a stick. I even think. this is legal in all 50, Canada and Europe, because your not really coasting, your engine and transmission are in full move, just no fuel and you have good brake and steering……. No, you cannot safely hypermile with an automatic like this, long down hill, you will damage the transmission eventually… I know you cannot tow an automatic, on its drive wheels, any faster than 30 mph, with an older style tow truck ( a hook ). In the old days, they would tow rear wheel drive cars from the rear on their front wheels. So that tells you something… Most cars today, except some German / Japanese luxuries and American models from Ford, Chevrolet and Dodge, are front wheel and there are even more AWD’s than rear wheel drives… You are not a very intelligent person. Hypermile, turning off the ignition? Fallowing a big rig that close? How old are you? Not to mention what state are you in? Last question, so I know where not to go. I have driven 43 states and Winsor Canada, In a big rig. If you got that close to my rear and I saw you, Well you would not have done it again. I no longer drive rig but log 35,000 plus miles a year driving.It is driving like yours that gets people killed. Because you can’t read and a; stupid vulgar ignorant American, whom makes statements to the adverse before reading. ‘ Ignition off ‘ in a VW with stick, is not; ‘ coasting ‘ or ‘ hypermileing ‘ and you don’t do it in front of your ‘ big rigs ‘… You the the car in gear, you have all systems and fuel injection cuts of fuel, read ! Like most stupids in America, if you had bothered to read the post, you’d seen my explanation and no I no not recommend you or anyone as stupid as you do this. Where do you live that 55 is a nominal cruising speed? If you go even 65 around where I live on the freeway, you are likely to get yourself rearended. Also, your engine must idle when it is in neutral, which does use gas. If you actually coast while in drive, the turning wheels will spin the engine without using any gas. And lastly, shifting in and out of gear like that creates much more wear on your clutch and transmission. The repairs alone will naturalize any savings on gas. Oh so all those assholes on the road that keep going 15 over and 15 under the speed limit for ‘no god damned reason’ are really just cheap asses trying to legitimize playing with a stick all day? That is a really stupid idea. When you coast the car with the engine off it cuts out your power assisted steering and brakes. I know a guy in school who did that on a mountain road and lost control of the car doing this and drove into a tree. Him and his friend died and the girls in the back seats were injured and mentally scared for life. What happens if a child were to run into the road when you did this and your power assisted brakes don’t work? You would kill them. You should NEVER coast the car with the engine off EVER. You must’ve missed the part where he’s still in gear, which means his engine is generating vacuum, which Observation vs. Inpatient Case Studies: Master Patient Status Assignment he still has power assisted brakes and, depending on the car, power-assisted steering. You like the other person can’t read I see… This is not coasting or ‘ hypermileing ‘ in fact these cars are built for this, little essay writing Bono reveals he doesnt know if U2 will ever tour again as it gets harder every time secret here. You cut the fuel only, understand now. No if you don’t have the right car and don’t know what you are doing stay out as they say. I have a few disagreements. One: Manual transmissions tend to hold their value better than automatics, for longer. I have no idea where you got any indication in the other direction, but it’s just not true. Friends of mine who work at or own car dealerships turn over their manual cars much more quickly. Two: If you have no clue how to drive a manual, yes, your chances of replacing your transmission earlier than an automatic are high. However, if you know what you are doing, there won’t be any difference, and in fact your transmission can last longer if you treat it correctly. Of course, if you drive a non-sporty manual in a sporty way, your transmission isn’t built for that, and you will have issues. Three: Manual transmissions are much better on slick roads / in winter conditions. The advantage of being able to control the power to the wheels with the clutch CAN NOT be overstated. I grew up in one of the worst winter weather areas in the country (Upper Michigan), and had absolutely no trouble in winter in a manual transmission car (a tiny Chevy Cavalier, to boot!), because if you ever spin your wheels, you can feather the clutch and get back in control. In an auto, it is much more difficult. Also, you can naturally control downhill speeds – added bonus – without having to slow down and switch back into drive, let the transmission get back into sync, etc. Four: Manual transmissions ARE more entertaining to drive, and actually increase your focus on the road – you’re more likely to pay attention and be in tune with what the vehicle has going on when you have to directly interact with it like that. Note: Paddle shifted manu-matics do have a lot of the same advantages that manuals do, because you have even better shifting control. However, my left leg gets cramped in them, so I prefer manual transmissions. Oh, and props on using the photo of the GTI shifter. Love that view. Right on with everthing you point out here. As for the replacement, most often the clutch is what goes in the manual, not the entire transmision like auto’s. I live in MN and I will choose to drive my 15 year old manual over my wife’s 4 year old AWD automatic anytime we have slick roads. Much more control. Now if I could only get a manual AWD (I’m thinking Subaru). One note on fuel economy: my car is estimated to get 17/24 mpg city/hwy. I average 28 mpg and it’s about 50/50 city/hwy miles. It’s called coasting; you cruise down hills, to stops, etc. while letting the engine idle (don’t be an idiot and turn the engine off unless you have a death wish). Taking it out of gear is much better than just taking your foot off the gas due to engine breaking plus the lower RPMs = less gas. Pat that’s true what you said about coasting but you have to remember in some cars if your just going to let it stall, or put it in neutral you could take away your power braking unless electric. Might as well just turn of the engine ( death trap !) I drive a manual and when you put it into neutral for coasting you do not turn the engine off so you will have power braking but the engine will be running in 500 rpm instead of 2000 rpm so you will save fuel. Garrett, as mentioned, you will not lose power-assisted braking so long as the engine is running. I couldn’s agree more with you… I had 12 cars, only two out of the 12 were automatic, I could not stand driving them. I parked one about 2 years ago, I bought a 350 engine and a manual tranny from an old 1988 iroc-z; I will get it How to Measure Things That Are Astronomically Far Away this spring. I sold the other one because I could stand getting even close to it. No disrespect to anybody, but depending on the vehicle, automatic transmission are for those who are lazy and/or does not know how to truly drive a car. I will take any manual car at any time over an automatic, and I have turned down deals after finding out the cars were automatic. I agree with all these points, especially the first one. Where I live, manul transmission Toyota Tacomas and anything VW with a manual transmission sell quickly and usually above blue book value! I would echo what Michael said – when driving in snow or on slick roads manuals give you much better control. I’m sorry but automatics are for people who are either lazy or don’t know how to drive a car… kinda like all wheel drive… it’s for people who don’t know or don’t care to know how to drive their car. This is the only country that is so automatic hungry… don’t we have an obesity problem too… could be related. Sticks are great if your driving a sports car not a Ford Fiesta. Get an automatic for some dinky car. The fun is with the sports car. A Ferrari would suck with an automatic, thats why they have sticks. umm no stick shifts are for any car really, yeah when people think stick shift they think sports car but the ford fiesta with a 5 speed manual will probably under go less maintenance than that ferrari. and generally now a days ferraris dont even have a stick they have paddle shifters. You rarely if ever do a total replacement of a manual transmission. Most commonly the the clutch is the only component that is replaced and that can be relatively inexpensive compared to replacing an automatic transmission or even components of an automatic transmission. It is common when an automatic transmission fails to need a total rebuild or replacement. In small cars, manuals also let you use all the power available from the engine by having control over shift points. This is why I would never buy a small car with an automatic. Small cheap cars typically have small cheap automatic transmissions that fail prematurely if they are driven hard. A manual can take the abuse. It’s about control, options and power. Automatics use up way too much power! Even 10 years ago, manual transmissions were scarce enough that I had to test drive a Subaru Outback with an automatic. The 2.5L engine is marginal for a car as heavy as the Outback. With the automatic, it was SLOW. I took a chance and got the manual with the same engine and it made a world of difference! With a manual transmission, you not only choose your shift points, you can change them on the essay on Simona Halep vs. Dominika Cibulkova | 2018 Wuhan Open Second Round | WTA Highlights ???????. You can choose to shift for power and maximize acceleration when necessary, then change your shift points to keep the engine at its most effecient speed to save gas. Best of both worlds. And, yes, it’s fun! I find it interesting that G hasn’t come back to comment on this… I love my manual transmission, its true, you have so much more control over the vehicle and it’s way more fun to drive. I’ll never drive another automatic again. This article was obviously not written by a car person. The choice of trannies is not going to be in order to gain a couple of dollars a year. That said, manuals will definitely save you money if you know how to drive them. More durable, and even the clutch will last a lifetime with due respect. Better gas mileage with a manual too. Don’t be fooled by the EPA ratings that may say otherwise. With a manual you can be sure to be in the most efficient rpm range of the engine, or choose not to if you demand performance. I’ve driven manuals for over 50 years, and never get tired of it. I agree with all the stick fans, but no one has discussed the scientific “control, ” rather than the “feeling of control.” Most people don’t know how to qualify it, but manual transmissions basically give you the control to manually shift the G forces. Having the choice to downshift around corners and exit ramps, etc. helps a whole lot. When it comes down to it, if you pit two GREAT drivers against each other, one auto and one manual (exactly same car), put the same cup full of water in their cup holder and have them drive the same route – the manual driver has more control over how much he spills, and if he is truly a great driver, no matter how good the auto driver, the manual will have more water left in his cup. Not sure if that made sense but… anyway, G forces. Plus, it’s better for grip – like in icy, rainy or muddy conditions (thus the jeep recommendation earlier). No one’s even talking about rear wheel drive versus front wheel drive. and for those of you saying it was faster in manual… it has more low end torque cuz you can push it harder. the ultimate horsepower doesnt change but the lbs of torque see a difference, especially from the driver. someone please make a cohesive agreement to my nonsensical stream of thought. LOL. Torque production at any given RPM is a direct function of HP. If you have less of it, you also have proportionally less HP, as well. Good sports autos today can switch as fast as any typical street manual even with the best drivers. When all things are equal (gear ratios, rear-end ratio, etc…), the reason a manual is faster than an auto has to do with “drivetrain loss.” Autos use hydraulic systems than are not as efficient as a directly linked non-slipping drivetrain (aka. manual). This is the reason that an identical car with a manual will show more power at the rear wheels, and it’s also why manuals are more fuel efficient at the same speed with the same final drive ratio. I would also speculate that the average weight of an automatic is higher, including the rotational mass of the drivetrain. 1st. the 84 escort manual got better mileage than the ’84 & ’11 auto car. So no, auto does not get better mileage. The ’11 manual had a close range gear box. Compare a ’11 civic 5 speed to A video game journalists reaction to the Filip Miucin plagiarism controversy auto, or a ’11 small pick up. Compare a TDI Jetta manual to an auto, the Manual wins every time. 2nd. Decelerating or shifting late does nothing to a manual tranny- I’m a mechanic and have rebuilt manual trannys. The only thing that will kill a manual is not using the clutch to shift or shifting without the clutch. Autos on the other hand can be ruined much easier, once the trans fluid is burned it needs to be flushed. Autos fail if you use them for pulling heavy trailers or driving them hard. Manuals only fail if you don’t keep them filled with lubricant. Manual will always be more efficient if you have the same gear ratios: Because Autos convert 5% of the engine power they receive into heat, and that is why autos need cooling lines etc. Manuals transmit all of there power!! For the discussion: Yes I have a Nissan 5spd. Jennifer Hockford, Local Author, Releases Three Book Series get on average 38 highway & 35 city. Essay writing OnePlus 6T Wishlist and Rumors! drove a auto of the same car(with same 1.6 L engine) and it had no power until you hit 20 mph and it only got 30 city & 34 highway MPG. I have saved money on a manual by being able to change my own clutch for $120 & a couple hours of my time and been able to push start it to get it started when battery is dead. If my Manual ever fails I know how to rebuild a manual trans to. At 250k Miles I wouldn’t trust an Auto. But with a manual- I know the car won’t let me down!! I’m a mechanic and have flushed many auto vehicles trannies and on others I’ve seen how much people spend to have faulty auto trannies rebuilt and repaired and the manuals are much more reliable, but also cheaper by far. Check this website out- Manuals get much better mileage even in newer vehicles: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rs-UlxhjYrk&feature=grec_index. KM is right you can’t fairly compare transmisions with a different amount of gears, the more the better mpg, Michael explains it perfectly. Saying automatics get better mpg essay on Simona Halep vs. Dominika Cibulkova | 2018 Wuhan Open Second Round | WTA Highlights ??????? the majority of people you “know” driving manuals are idiots is not fair to the car. A manual transmission gives you the control to do what you want for better fuel economy, performance and all inbetween. I love it when I drive an automatic and I have to floor the gas too down shift only to have already reached my goal speed by the time it does. I think people confuse automatic with “artificial inteligence” it doesn’t know what your trying to do, it just does what it’s supposed to do, shift gears. The EPA gives you the data for manual mpg when it is shifting gears at all the same points an automatic would be. Lucky for most of us we are smarter than a machine and can adapt to the driving situation. I myself average 20% better mpg for my vehicle than what’s stated by the EPA. And my wife is all about performance and control than mpg, she never does my wallet any favors. autos go out less than manuals? Uh. I’ve owned five manuals and in all but one case the tranny always outlasted the engine, and then the repair for the manual only cost 300 bucks and wasn’t required till the 200000 mark. I’ve had two automatics, and one of them went bad at about 130000. I purposly buy manuals for their longevity. If somethings gonna fail, i’d rather it be the 150 dollar clutch verses some internal component of an auto that costs so much to get to that you might as well do a rebuild while you’re in there. Economy wise, the fiesta is an automatic manual which means that it’s a manual tranny rigged to shift itself and thus not a true auto. The new chevy cruze eco has a 6 mpg disparity in the manuals favor. Car makers are trying out new technology like cvt (continuously variable tranny) and even though it may make a car more comfortable to drive, it’s also sucking up the fuel. In my experience auto’s are needlessly complex (i’ve rebuilt a few), and hopelessly unreliable. If your going to own your vehicle for more than a hundred thousand miles you might as well figure in the price of a new trans into your maintenance budget. Autos are a crutch for the lazy. Why do you need a free hand? In most states it’s illegal to talk on the phone or eat while driving. That manual just might save you a ticket or accident. Also, I love the fact that when i’m driving on icy road, all I have to do in an emergency situation is push in the clutch and the wheels become free spinning. I once had a guy driving an auto spin into my lane and hit me because his tires lost traction on ice, and his tranny just kept applying power despite the fact that he was in a spin and headed for my fender. I attempted a panic stop to avoid him and managed to stay in my own lane thanks to my ability to quickly disconnect power to my wheels and thus maintain traction. If the driver of the other vehicle had had the same feature I may 4 Easy Steps to Setting Your Life Goals been able to avoid the body shop. So basically unless you wanna Woman says I want to be rich and Im not sorry in NYT article an illegal hamburger while adjusting your radio and calling your cousin on the cell as you drive through town, a manual will do anything an auto can do and save you money in the process. I am 16, i live in Colorado and i have my permit. My dad owns a manual transmission and so that’s what i learned on. I have been hooked since my first time driving it and now i’m on the car hunt and i will pass up any car that’s automatic. I just can’t stand the automatic transmission. It’ sooooooooo lazy to drive and no fun. The manual just give you the power to do whatever it feels like sometimes. I drove up a 30% grade dirt road that was entirely ice. With no essay topics Is Butter a Healthy Fat? i was able to make it up by putting it in first and feathering the throttle. With automatic we would have never made it ten feet and would have driven off the side. Anyways the point of this is that manual is just better for the future and from now on i will only buy manual transmissions. Lastly, you can still have a free hand with manual you only really shift when you reach third gear and you rarely ever need to shift past that. Comparing the cost of a manual; number 1; the gear ratios and final drive gearing ratio, are not the same, hence less power. Just compare the 0-60 times for the same models. Todays engines deliver much more low end torque allowing for engineers to compensate on fuel economy. The automatics just still don’t have that power ! Add to this, he compares an automatic with a 6 speed versus a 5 speed manual for fuel economy. Give it a 6 or 7 speed manual and then lets see the results. As far as repairs; todays automatics rarely break down, but when they do, wow look out ! That’s what automobile companies, don’t want you to know, if you keep your cars beyond warranty. With a new BMW; a new clutch is about 800.00 $, give or take, an automatic is about 10,000-15,000 for a Mercedes-Benz ! Manual gear boxes rarely go, unless you let them run out of gear oil ! Manuals are getting better and better and need less service than autos too. I can make a clutch last over 100,000 miles. There are 2 clutches in some models for smooth shifting too. There are no filters or anything needing to be tightened, no ATF to be changed or leaks to worry about, just heavy gear oil in a manual transmission, never needs changing. I don’t even think; some newer manuals even need any more clutch adjustments, that was the only thing on older ones and was always dirt cheap, you did it when your oil was changed… Automobile manufacturers AND DEALERS, what else is new in the US, are trying to kill it themselves, more money made selling and repairing autos too. Consumers, had not ought to succumb to free markets, more like free choice ! Write the; companies, media and your congressman if need be. More than 50% of Europe, still drives stick and I am sure elsewhere too… So theres proof they’re still great products. ALL, over the road 18 wheel freight trucks use manuals, no automatic can replace that job, they’re not durable enough ! Finally; when comes trade in, its true you pay less and get less in trade, however, if you have something nice, BMW or another German make with low miles, you can name your price too, trade or sell yourself ! Trying to get a certain make and model in manual new, its a task, now, try getting it used, even harder ! I had an Audi off lease soon, I put an add in, 1st call called wanted it…… Manuals will come back and big time when, Americans get off their lazy asses and figure out they’re; still unbeatable economically, cars get more and more expensive, traffic declines in the US, government continues to tighten fuel economy and mass transit continues its up swing since an all time low in 1970……. Actually they do make automagic 18 wheelers now a days and they Morpholio Trace and Shapr3D Create DragnFly to Streamline Sketching and Modeling essay up fine. Just in the USA truckers typically prefer the good old manual transmissions. They tend to have a lot more gears then we are used to in cars too. Oh and Automatic 18 wheelers are more common in europe than they are in the USA. Irony… Are you serious? The Disaster Tourist - The transmissions do not last as long as automatics? That is the first time I have EVER herd someone use that argument. I have been around mechanics and every one of them will tell you due to a manual being ALOT less complex than an automatic they have far fewer problems, and replacing a clutch cost at least a thousand dollars less than rebuilding an automatic. My daily driver is a 97 cavalier with a 5spd with 156,000 miles, the transmission is perfect and IT HAS THE ORIGINAL CLUTCH. I sit in rush hour traffic reguraly and if you hang back off the car in front of you, I can coast along most of the time in 2nd gear NOT using the clutch OR the brake, therefore making it EASIER than an automatic in traffic. You want some convincing on why manuals are better? Drive a stick shift in the snow, a driver can work the gears based on what they see ahead of them, downshifting and keeping in your 1-2-3rd gears allows you to let off the gas to let the car slow without ever touching the brake, that means so sliding around. See some deep ruts coming up? Go into lower gear so you have more power on tap. Just crusing on the highway at 30mph? run 4th or 5th so you bearly use the gas pedal, that means no loss of traction. You can also use techniques such as starting in second gear, riding the clutch a little to gain a traction advantage. I honestly do not feel safe driving an automatic in the snow, I cannot understand how anoyne would. Another issue I have with your argument, you compared a vehicle that has a 5spd manual, with one that has a 6spd automatic. How about you compare apples to apples and take a look at the Chevrolet Essay topics Cindy Lange-Kubick: A virtual-reality tour of dementia, a temporary experience of an un Eco. 6spd automatic looses 3mpg city and highway to the 6spd Manual Cruze. If you want to make comparisons, please use a stronger example, the extra gear in an automatic fiesta will obviously perform better. Last but not least, I visit drag racing strips a few times a year, and based on the crowds and lines i wait in to race my car, I’d say drag racing is far from “not in style.” Again your bias. After reading this I came to one sad conclusion, you, like most Americans, rather have “your hand free for other things” like texting, playing with the radio, or eating instead of using that hand to shift and DRIVE. Driving stick shift keeps you more focused on the road and whats going on with your vehicle, it makes Keira Knightley redeems Bend It Like Beckham through queer Colette a better driver. It’s a shame more Americans agree with you more than me. Mr. Miller received an education here ! I predict manuals with a ‘ park ‘ feature, so as to allow users to use Scarborough’s Essay Lady helps dropouts with the art of writing like remote starters etc. This would seem easy to do. Right now, there’s is no market for this, especially on the US side ! In Europe with 500 million users @ plus 53 % manual versus; the US @ 300 million with less than 2 %, Elections office fills in blank ovals on ballots more incentive, but they are slower than Americans about electronic junk… I know some German and other European car buyers prefer performance and engine technicals to this junk, me too ! They are getting better and better and and they will make somewhat a comeback, I think a market share of 10-15% is not impossible, to start, considering that 30 % of all cars sold in 1980 had manuals ! Japan and the US are the only heavily ‘ automatic ‘ markets ! As far as the Japanese; they fell asleep big time ! There’s no need to explain, between the European and Japanese automotive industry who won. Europe itself; east Europe, Russia, China, India, south east Asia, Africa, South America and Mexico now even the US itself, as far as the luxury sector… The Japanese and Americans allowed the European motor industry to become the largest in production both in Europe at over 17 million units and world-wide in many of the above markets. China has passed European production, however not in dollars and certainly not world wide, I doubt this will ever happen. Almost 1/3 of China’s automakers are European based ! A vast domestic market there and the Chinese are like the Americans, they have no stomach for the world… All your eggs in one basket like the US and Japan in north America gets you nowhere…. I’m willing to concede a couple things here: In most cases, automatics are more fuel efficient than manuals. Certainly if you took the automatics away from the people who are driving them now and forced them to drive a stick, gas mileage would suffer. However, a comparison essay writing What is the death comet, and when will it be here? a six-speed automatic and a five-speed manual is not valid. I agree that you probably aren’t going to come out ahead on buying and selling the car. When buying a new car, I’ve often heard the dealers say “Oh, you want a manual transmission? Those are hard to find; it’s going to cost you” and “Oh, you’re trading in a manual transmission? Those are hard to sell. It’s going to cost you.” But yes – when you find a buyer who really wants a stick, everything works out perfectly. As for repairs, I’m really scratching my head here. Manual transmissions are more failure-prone and more expensive to repair than automatics? Again, I suspect that this might be the case if we forced the population at large to switch to stick shifts and they learned the hard way. But even a terribly abused stick is likely to need nothing more than a new clutch. I suspect that not many automatic transmissions ever get repaired or replaced. When the transmission goes, the cost of repair is so high that the car is effectively totaled and it ends up in a junkyard. As for the final question – “Convince us automatic trans drivers why we should consider a stick.” – I can only say, if you have to ask, you wouldn’t understand.

Current Viewers: